Categories
Controlled Substance Act Legislation Meet Blank Rome Regulatory Compliance

Blank Rome Poised to Guide Clients Through Marijuana Rescheduling

Shane A. Pennington, Frank A. Segalland Scott H. Moskol

As the cannabis industry anticipates a significant executive order that could reschedule marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, Blank Rome’s Cannabis industry group is ready to guide clients with strategic insight and timely advice. Regulatory authority and Blank Rome partner Shane A. Pennington, with the support of Cannabis industry group co-chairs Frank A. Segall and Scott H. Moskol, have been directly involved in addressing the Department of Justice’s proposal for rescheduling marijuana on behalf of our clients. Encouraging updates continue to emerge daily, and we believe an executive order authorizing this change will be issued soon.

Shane, Frank, Scott, and Blank Rome’s team of cannabis attorneys are at the cutting edge of industry trends, closely following and influencing policy developments in Washington, D.C. The Cannabis industry group is dedicated to keeping our clients updated in real time, helping you act swiftly and take advantage of new possibilities arising from this historic development.

Once a clear path is set by executive order, our team will host a series of meetings and webinars to help clients navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and maximize the benefits of rescheduling. Building on our longstanding leadership at the forefront of the cannabis industry, our deep knowledge of legal and regulatory issues enables us to guide clients through emerging changes, so they can confidently navigate and benefit from the evolving market.

As you prepare for this transformative moment in the industry, trust Blank Rome to be your partner every step of the way. For questions or to learn more about our services, please contact us.

Categories
Banking and Restructuring Controlled Substance Act Employment Issues ESOPs (Employee Stock Ownership Plans) Legislation Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

High Stakes and Material Changes in the Bay State: Senate Bill No. 2722 vs. House Bill No. 4160

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

There were several material changes relating to strategy, compliance, and deal‑making advanced by Massachusetts Senate Bill No. 2722 (“S. 2722”) on November 13, 2025. Below is a short summary of what you need to know about the Senate’s rewrite and meaningful reshaping of several House‑backed ideas (under House Bill No. 4160 (“H. 4160”)) for changing the legal regime of cannabis in the Commonwealth.

1.      Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Employee stock ownership plans (“ESOPs”) are here to stay. Both bills tell the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (“CCC”) to set up clear procedures to allow the sale of a business to employees via an ESOP and to exclude a trustee acting solely for an ESOP during or after a sale when counting toward cannabis license caps under the Massachusetts cannabis laws. That part did not change, which is a positive result for the Commonwealth. The proposed changes to the current law enable succession planning, retention, and worker‑ownership options for operators and investors without tripping license caps and also improve exit/liquidity paths for owners. This also means there would be no caps on the number of licenses an ESOP can own.

Categories
Banking and Restructuring Controlled Substance Act Interviews Legislation Meet Blank Rome Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

Closing the Hemp Loophole: What Monday’s Farm Bill Update Means for Delta-8 and Hemp-Derived THC

Marc A. Polito —

At Blank Rome’s 9th Annual State of the Cannabis Industry Conference, Frank A. Segall, partner and co-chair of the firm’s Cannabis practice, asked a panel—including Joseph Andreae, CEO of CULTA, Jared Maloof, CEO of Standard Wellness, Ed Schmults, CEO of Firelands Scientific, and Jim Scott, CEO of Statehouse Holdings—what is the number one issue confronting the cannabis industry today? All four chief executives unanimously echoed the same sentiment: the number one issue confronting state-regulated cannabis operators today is the unregulated hemp market, which has become a growing thorn in their sides as the hemp market picked up steam over the past few years. Well, with new action by lawmakers yesterday, it appears this issue is on the brink of being resolved!

Over the past six years, the hemp industry has transformed from a niche agricultural sector into a national marketplace for diverse cannabinoid products. That transformation was catalyzed by the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized hemp by defining it as cannabis with no more than 0.3 percent delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) on a dry-weight basis. What resulted from this was an unintended market: intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoids such as delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, and other analogs produced from cannabidiol (“CBD”) isolates through chemical conversion. The “hemp loophole,” as it came to be known, allowed psychoactive products to proliferate in convenience stores, restaurants, and online and circumvented the strict controls applied to state-licensed cannabis.

Categories
Controlled Substance Act Legislation Meet Blank Rome Regulatory Compliance

Federal Marijuana Rescheduling Effort Challenged in Congress

Marc A. Polito —

Where Things Stand Now

Last week, Republican lawmakers in Congress took a major step to block President Donald Trump’s potential move to reschedule marijuana. The GOP-controlled House Appropriations Committee approved a spending bill that would prohibit the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) from using federal funds to reschedule or deschedule marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. This move comes as the Trump administration signals it is considering reclassifying cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, a change that would have significant implications for the industry and for federal-state relations.

The bill, advanced by the House Appropriations Committee, includes explicit language: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to reschedule marijuana… or to remove marijuana from the schedules established under section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act.” This provision, if enacted, would effectively freeze the ongoing federal review process and reserve the authority to change marijuana’s status exclusively for Congress, rather than the executive branch.

Categories
Banking and Restructuring Controlled Substance Act Employment Issues Legislation Meet Blank Rome Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

Turning Over a New Leaf: How Cannabis Receiverships Can Cultivate a Stronger Future

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

It is no secret that the cannabis industry has been on a wild ride lately, especially in mature markets. Many operators are feeling the pressure, and they are not alone. Let us break down the current landscape, why it is tough out there, and how receiverships and distressed sales might actually be a positive move for struggling cannabis companies.

Many developed cannabis markets are facing serious challenges. Inflation and a shaky economy are making it harder for businesses to stay afloat (regardless of industry type), on top of market saturation that has caused cannabis prices to drop, and tight profit margins for businesses in the more established marijuana states. This is compounded with the harsh effects of tax burdens due to 280E—where cannabis companies are unable to deduct otherwise established business expenses from gross income as a result of the federal illegality of cannabis in the United States—and lack of liquidity from inability to access traditional debt financing and institutional equity markets. As a result, many cannabis companies are finding it difficult to pay their debts and keep the lights on. And because cannabis is still federally illegal in the United States, struggling cannabis operators are limited when it comes to utilizing federal bankruptcy mechanisms for relief.

But hope is not lost. Even in tough times, cannabis businesses along with their management, creditors, and investors, have found options to help their companies restructure and move forward. One of those is a state-level receivership.

Categories
Controlled Substance Act

Hold Your Horses – Cannabis Rescheduling Hearings Stayed, Pending Appeal

Max M. Borg —

In the latest development in a road to rescheduling cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), on January 13, 2025, in the Matter of Schedules of Controlled Substances: Proposed Rescheduling of Marijuana, DEA Docket No. 1362 Hearing Docket No. 24-44, Chief Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) John Mulrooney cancelled the January 21, 2025 hearing on the merits of the Drug Enforcement Agency’s (“DEA”) proposal to reschedule cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III.

After a request by two private movants (the “Movants”) to remove the DEA from its role as proponent of the proposed reclassification rule was denied, the Movants filed a motion for the ALJ to reconsider its denial of this request. On January 13, 2025, ALJ Mulrooney (i) denied the motion for reconsideration but (ii) granted leave for the Movants to file an interlocutory appeal on the merits of ALJ Mulrooney’s refusal to remove the DEA as proponent of the reclassification. While this Order opens the door on appeal to potentially enable to a private actor to replace the DEA as proponent of the reclassification, the January 13 Order will surely cause further delay in the process of potential rescheduling, evidenced by ALJ Mulrooney’s ordering the Movants and the Government to provide a joint status update 90 days from the issuance of the Order, and every 90 days thereafter.

For those hoping that cannabis would be reclassified before the Trump administration enters office, this is a major disappointment. For those who have been paying attention, this is no surprise, and more of the same.

In a constantly evolving and [still – very] nascent industry like the cannabis industry, one truth has remained: it is a fools errand to try to predict if, when, and how regulatory changes and developments will occur at the federal level. For years, there have been similar questions floated and discussed amongst advisors, operators, and investors in the cannabis industry: “when will cannabis be legalized?”,“when will the SAFE act pass”, “surely Congress will do something, right?”.

Federal action is largely an issue of legislative and regulatory priorities (or, as we have seen, a lack-thereof). Folks can talk and pontificate all they want, but the reality has remained the same: States (at this point, 39 in total, having already passed laws allowing medical marijuana use) are left to fend for themselves, as are the businesses trying to operate with one (if not two) arms tied behind their back.

When President Biden requested in October 2022 for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) to “initiate the administrative process to review expeditiously how marijuana is scheduled under federal law”, there was tepid excitement. Hey – the White House is asking HHS to look into this… progress! Then, in August 2023, HHS issued a recommendation to the DEA that cannabis be reclassified from Schedule I to Schedule III under the CSA. At this point, industry participants started to cautiously buy in – maybe – just maybe – this will be the time something actually happens. After all, for business operators, a reclassification to Schedule III under the CSA, would have potentially huge implications – potentially rendering §280E of the tax code inapplicable to cannabis businesses, opening the door for cannabis businesses to deduct various business expenses like any other businesses complying with their state and local laws. And yet, here we are, almost two and a half years later, and the industry is still hoping for change at the federal level.

For operators and investors alike, the reality is simple. Now is not the time to focus on what could happen – or what we hope will happen – at the federal level. Industry participants must continue to focus on what they control: increasing operational efficiency to achieve and maintain profitability.

Categories
Controlled Substance Act Employment Issues Legislation Meet Blank Rome Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

Welcome to Cannabis Industry Insights

Frank A. Segall, Scott H. Moskol, and Max M. Borg —

Whether you are a plant-touching operator or an ancillary business, lender, or investor, Blank Rome’s Cannabis Industry Insights blog is your go-to resource for the cannabis industry.

Authored by our trailblazing Cannabis practice attorneys, the Cannabis Industry Insights blog explores the rapidly evolving legal, regulatory, and business landscape, helping those in the sector stay ahead of the curve and seize industry opportunities. Our cannabis team was one of the first in the United States to utilize its extensive corporate and finance experience to support the cannabis industry, and has received numerous accolades, including Law360’s prestigious 2023 Cannabis Practice Group of the Year.

Through our blog, we will continue to explore issues that directly impact the cannabis industry. With the announcement of the rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3 under the Controlled Substance Act, we are optimistic about new and expanding opportunities for industry players. In addition to interviews with industry leaders, the blog will cover such topics as the impact of rescheduling on 280E taxation; legal and regulatory compliance concerns; the landscape for mergers and acquisitions; legislative efforts; banking, insurance, and other business issues; capital markets; workouts and restructurings impacting the industry; the growing importance of e-commerce, fintech, and regtech; debt and equity financings; labor and employment issues in light of unionization efforts; data privacy and security; and employee stock ownership plans (“ESOPs”); among other areas that are relevant to the underpinnings of the industry.

Our goal is to help cannabis businesses survive and thrive in this highly regulated environment, as well as to assist new participants in entering this exciting industry. Subscribe below to receive our timely content:

Categories
Controlled Substance Act Regulatory Compliance

Rescheduling Timeline and Exclusions

Gustav Stickley V —

Advocates of the cannabis industry are understandably excited over the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (“DEA”) recent publication of its proposed rule to reschedule marijuana as a Schedule III controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”). However, the proposed rule is subject to the due process required by the federal rulemaking regime and will not be officially implemented (if at all) for at least a couple of months, possibly longer. Below we set forth the current timeline of the rulemaking process.

Further, it is helpful to understand what exactly is being rescheduled. We know there are hundreds of cannabinoids, derived from both hemp and from cannabis, and there are manufacturing processes allowing for the creation of synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and other synthetic cannabinoids. So what’s being rescheduled as Schedule III? We will discuss this below.