Category: Regulatory Compliance

High Stakes and Material Changes in the Bay State: Senate Bill No. 2722 vs. House Bill No. 4160

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date November 18, 2025

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

There were several material changes relating to strategy, compliance, and deal‑making advanced by Massachusetts Senate Bill No. 2722 (“S. 2722”) on November 13, 2025. Below is a short summary of what you need to know about the Senate’s rewrite and meaningful reshaping of several House‑backed ideas (under House Bill No. 4160 (“H. 4160”)) for changing the legal regime of cannabis in the Commonwealth.

1. Employee Stock Ownership Plans

Employee stock ownership plans (“ESOPs”) are here to stay. Both bills tell the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (“CCC”) to set up clear procedures to allow the sale of a business to employees via an ESOP and to exclude a trustee acting solely for an ESOP during or after a sale when counting toward cannabis license caps under the Massachusetts cannabis laws. That part did not change, which is a positive result for the Commonwealth. The proposed changes to the current law enable succession planning, retention, and worker‑ownership options for operators and investors without tripping license caps and also improve exit/liquidity paths for owners. This also means there would be no caps on the number of licenses an ESOP can own.

Tags Massachusetts

Banking and Restructuring Controlled Substance Act Interviews Legislation Meet Blank Rome Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

Closing the Hemp Loophole: What Monday’s Farm Bill Update Means for Delta-8 and Hemp-Derived THC

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date November 11, 2025

Marc A. Polito —

At Blank Rome’s 9th Annual State of the Cannabis Industry Conference, Frank A. Segall, partner and co-chair of the firm’s Cannabis practice, asked a panel—including Joseph Andreae, CEO of CULTA, Jared Maloof, CEO of Standard Wellness, Ed Schmults, CEO of Firelands Scientific, and Jim Scott, CEO of Statehouse Holdings—what is the number one issue confronting the cannabis industry today? All four chief executives unanimously echoed the same sentiment: the number one issue confronting state-regulated cannabis operators today is the unregulated hemp market, which has become a growing thorn in their sides as the hemp market picked up steam over the past few years. Well, with new action by lawmakers yesterday, it appears this issue is on the brink of being resolved!

Over the past six years, the hemp industry has transformed from a niche agricultural sector into a national marketplace for diverse cannabinoid products. That transformation was catalyzed by the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized hemp by defining it as cannabis with no more than 0.3 percent delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) on a dry-weight basis. What resulted from this was an unintended market: intoxicating hemp-derived cannabinoids such as delta-8 THC, delta-10 THC, and other analogs produced from cannabidiol (“CBD”) isolates through chemical conversion. The “hemp loophole,” as it came to be known, allowed psychoactive products to proliferate in convenience stores, restaurants, and online and circumvented the strict controls applied to state-licensed cannabis.

Tags delta-10, delta-8, delta-9, Farm Bill, hemp, hemp loophole

Controlled Substance Act Legislation Meet Blank Rome Regulatory Compliance

Federal Marijuana Rescheduling Effort Challenged in Congress

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date September 24, 2025

Marc A. Polito —

Where Things Stand Now

Last week, Republican lawmakers in Congress took a major step to block President Donald Trump’s potential move to reschedule marijuana. The GOP-controlled House Appropriations Committee approved a spending bill that would prohibit the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) from using federal funds to reschedule or deschedule marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. This move comes as the Trump administration signals it is considering reclassifying cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III, a change that would have significant implications for the industry and for federal-state relations.

The bill, advanced by the House Appropriations Committee, includes explicit language: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to reschedule marijuana… or to remove marijuana from the schedules established under section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act.” This provision, if enacted, would effectively freeze the ongoing federal review process and reserve the authority to change marijuana’s status exclusively for Congress, rather than the executive branch.

Tags Congress, descheduling, House Appropriations Committee, rescheduling, Schedule I, Schedule III

Banking and Restructuring Controlled Substance Act Employment Issues Legislation Meet Blank Rome Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

Turning Over a New Leaf: How Cannabis Receiverships Can Cultivate a Stronger Future

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date September 10, 2025

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

It is no secret that the cannabis industry has been on a wild ride lately, especially in mature markets. Many operators are feeling the pressure, and they are not alone. Let us break down the current landscape, why it is tough out there, and how receiverships and distressed sales might actually be a positive move for struggling cannabis companies.

Many developed cannabis markets are facing serious challenges. Inflation and a shaky economy are making it harder for businesses to stay afloat (regardless of industry type), on top of market saturation that has caused cannabis prices to drop, and tight profit margins for businesses in the more established marijuana states. This is compounded with the harsh effects of tax burdens due to 280E—where cannabis companies are unable to deduct otherwise established business expenses from gross income as a result of the federal illegality of cannabis in the United States—and lack of liquidity from inability to access traditional debt financing and institutional equity markets. As a result, many cannabis companies are finding it difficult to pay their debts and keep the lights on. And because cannabis is still federally illegal in the United States, struggling cannabis operators are limited when it comes to utilizing federal bankruptcy mechanisms for relief.

But hope is not lost. Even in tough times, cannabis businesses along with their management, creditors, and investors, have found options to help their companies restructure and move forward. One of those is a state-level receivership.

Tags distressed sale, receivership

Legislation Regulatory Compliance

Continued Momentum for Social Consumption Lounges

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date February 12, 2025

Gustav Stickley V —

For a long time, social consumption lounges have been a sort of “White Whale” in the adult-use cannabis industry, murmured about and pursued but rarely spotted. Luckily for us Captain Ahabs, a number of state legislatures have begun taking action on developing a licensing and operational framework for social consumption lounges and cannabis events permitting consumption. The Cannabis Control Commission of Massachusetts issued its proposed rules and licensing structure at the end of 2024 (see Social Consumption Lounges in Massachusetts: Proposed Rules for more information). Most recently at the end of January, Maryland’s house and senate also took action by introducing two complementary bills to establish rules and to regulate the hosting of events permitting cannabis consumption in the Old Line State (Legislation – HB0132 and Legislation – SB0215). Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York have also recently taken steps towards developing and enhancing the social consumption lounge regime in their respective states.

Both Maryland bills remain under review of the respective finance committees, but here is a quick hitter summary on the contents.

Initially, the state would accept applications for 15 licenses that would permit the serving of single-serving, infused beverages and edibles sourced from third-party operators.
Neither the smoking of cannabis nor the infusion of foods and beverages on-site would be permitted.
Licensed locations would provide the Maryland Cannabis Administration at least 60 days advance notice of an event involving cannabis consumption. Therefore, this license type wouldn’t operate as a social consumption lounge, but would permit a location to host a temporary cannabis event where the consumption of cannabis products is permitted.

As you can see, the proposed bills are quite restrictive, but I choose to view progress as is and take solace in the old adage, “Rome wasn’t built in a day.”

Tags cannabis consumption lounges, lounges, social consumption

Legislation Regulatory Compliance

MA Cannabis Commission Releases New HCA Resources

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date February 7, 2025

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

Last week, the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (“CCC” or the “Commission”) released new resources for navigating the rocky waters of community impact fees (“CIFs”) and host community agreements (“HCAs”). This announcement likely comes in response to the ruminating and yearning for additional guidance by operators and municipalities following the CCC’s release of new regulations and host community agreement template last year. See our prior blog post, “CCC’s Model HCA & Approval Process,” for more information on those regulations and HCA template.

This new release details several new resources available to cannabis businesses and their host communities in Massachusetts. Kimberly Roy, the Commissioner and Chapter 180 Working Group HCA Co-Chair stated, “[t]hese guidance documents are meant to serve as compliance tools to help clarify and streamline the new processes. As we approach the one-year mark in March of the new HCA requirements, the Commission continues to exercise its statutorily given authority to review and approve Host Community Agreements to ensure these contracts are compliant with current law.”

Tags Cannabis Control Commission, CCC, CIF, community impact fee, HCA, host community agreements

Banking and Restructuring Mergers and Acquisitions Regulatory Compliance

November 2024 Transaction Highlights: A Month of Newsworthy Successes

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date December 4, 2024

Marc A. Polito —

Our Cannabis Industry Group would like to thank our clients—major cannabis market leaders—for yet another successful month, trusting us to close several notable and newsworthy deals across various practice areas and industries in November 2024. Our team of dedicated attorneys provided strategic counsel on complex transactions, including banking and finance, mergers and acquisitions, workouts and receiverships, and public securities, showcasing our commitment to delivering exceptional results for our clients. These achievements underscore the strong partnerships we have with our clients, as well as our firm’s extensive experience and collaborative approach to navigating intricate legal and business landscapes while servicing major market leaders in the cannabis industry.

Tags financing, transactions

Legislation Regulatory Compliance

Massachusetts Superior Court Holds That New HCA Law Does Not Apply Retroactively

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date July 18, 2024

Max M. Borg —

On June 10, 2024, Associate Justice Jeffrey Karp, of the Massachusetts Superior Court, Essex (the “Court”), issued an important—and, to many licensed cannabis businesses in Massachusetts, surprising—ruling in the case of Haverhill Stem LLC vs. James J. Fiorentini, that the new Host Community Agreement regulations (See Chapter 180 of the Acts of 2022, “An Act Relative to Equity in the Cannabis Industry” (the “New HCA Law”)) promulgated by the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (the “CCC”) do not apply retroactively to the Host Community Agreement (the “Stem HCA”) entered into in 2018 between the City of Haverhill, Massachusetts, (the “City”) and Haverhill Stem LLC (“Stem”), a licensed cannabis dispensary.

Therefore, the Court held that the Stem HCA is governed by the language of G.L. c. 94G and 935 CMR 500 et seq. as in effect at the time of entry into the Stem HCA (the “Old HCA Law”), such that the Stem HCA is not governed by the New HCA Law.

Tags CIF, community impact fee, HCA, host community agreements, Massachusetts

Regulatory Compliance

CCC’s Model HCA & Approval Process

Post author By Blank Rome LLP
Post date July 10, 2024

Lauren Medeiros Forster —

In May, the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (“CCC” or the “Commission”) released a bulletin (the “Bulletin”) regarding some administrative license extensions in response to the Commission’s new framework and processes governing host community agreements (“HCAs”) in Massachusetts.

Under the CCC’s new regulations governing HCAs, licensees, and their host communities, licensees are required to submit to the CCC a compliant HCA that is approved by the Commission before the licensee can be granted approval for their final license or an annual license renewal.

Tags Cannabis Control Commission, CCC, host community agreements, Massachusetts